The better you are the stronger it makes you: Evidence on the asymmetric impact of liberalization
In: Journal of development economics, Band 99, Heft 2, S. 474-485
ISSN: 0304-3878
20 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of development economics, Band 99, Heft 2, S. 474-485
ISSN: 0304-3878
In: Economic Development and Cultural Change, Band 71, Heft 1, S. 111-149
ISSN: 1539-2988
In: The economic journal: the journal of the Royal Economic Society, Band 120, Heft 544, S. 481-499
ISSN: 1468-0297
In: Journal of international economics, Band 111, S. 1-20
ISSN: 0022-1996
A growing literature aiming at explaining differences across firms in productivity and access to global export markets has focused on the internal organization of firms. This paper contributes to this literature by evaluating the impact of a program that focuses on enhancing competitiveness of small and medium enterprises in Brazil by providing coaching and consulting on management and production practices. Specifically, the paper tests whether the program induces treated firms to reorganize knowledge by adding more layers of different skills and competencies to their workforces. Using a unique firm-level dataset, the number of layers of the firms are compared before and after the program. The impact of the program is identified by relying on an instrumental variable approach, exploiting the quasi-experiment roll-out of its implementation, which was carried out at different times across Brazilian regions. The analysis finds that the program had an effect and that this effect is heterogeneous. The program is particularly effective in promoting the reorganization of firms with initially fewer layers. The results confirm another finding of the literature, namely that in re-organized firms inequality of wages increases, as firms pay higher wages in added higher layers than in pre-existing ones. Finally, these results are used to discuss how the change in firms' organization is positively correlated with export performance.
BASE
Policy attitude towards trade integration and foreign direct investment (FDI) is often a controversial yet popular subject. This note presents evidences from recent policy researches that arguing that engaging in an open trade and investment regime have brought productivity gains which is key factor for sustaining increase in income per-capita. Evidence from Indonesia also suggests that foreign owned plants have become increasingly important, generating a significant share of exports and overall output, as well as more productive and more export intensive than domestic plants, and to spend more on RD and training. FDI also have positive impact on firms in the same sector, through competition and demonstration effects, and in upstream sectors, as suppliers to foreign-owned plants improve the quality of their own products to meet their clients more exacting needs. Evidence also suggests a positive impact from import competition in improving allocative efficiency across manufacturing plants which is a key element in driving productivity in manufacturing sector.
BASE
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 47, S. 102-120
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 44, S. 180-193
In: Research policy: policy, management and economic studies of science, technology and innovation, Band 52, Heft 8, S. 104786
ISSN: 1873-7625
In: Non-Tariff Barriers, Regionalism and Poverty; World Scientific Studies in International Economics, S. 393-406
In: Journal of international economics, Band 89, Heft 2, S. 379-392
ISSN: 0022-1996
In: Journal of development economics, Band 167, S. 103244
ISSN: 0304-3878
This paper examines whether labor productivity converged across Peru's regions ("departments") during 2002-12. Given the large differences in labor productivity across the regions of Peru, such convergence has the potential to raise aggregate productivity and incomes, and also reduce regional inequalities. The paper finds that labor productivity in the secondary sector (especially manufacturing) and the mining sector has converged across Peruvian departments. The paper does not find robust evidence for labor productivity convergence in agriculture and services. These patterns are consistent with recent cross-country evidence and with the hypothesis that productivity convergence is more likely in sectors with greater scope for market integration, because of the effects of competition and knowledge flows. The convergence in labor productivity within manufacturing and mining has been sufficient to lead to convergence in aggregate labor productivity across departments. But because services and agriculture continue to employ the majority of workers in Peru, aggregate convergence is slower than that within manufacturing. The paper also finds that poverty rates are not converging across departments. The limited impact of labor productivity convergence on poverty could be tied to the facts that not all sectors are experiencing productivity convergence, poorer people are employed in sectors where convergence has been slower (such as agriculture), and there is very little labor reallocation toward converging sectors (such as manufacturing).
BASE
In: Journal of international economics, Band 95, Heft 1, S. 1-15
ISSN: 0022-1996
In: Journal of development economics, Band 138, S. 192-204
ISSN: 0304-3878